Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Mixture (Read 1667 times)
Feb 2nd, 2010 at 4:02am

Mazza   Offline
Colonel
:D
Melbourne, Australia.

Gender: male
Posts: 3184
*****
 
Okay I have always had 'auto-mixture' on, but I would like to be cool and have it OFF, so I need to know when to apply different amounts of mixture (Lean, full, ect) So any advise would be great Smiley
 

Sunset Chasing...RULES

...
AMD 9550 2.43 X4 - 2Gb RAM 800Mhz DDRII - Asus 4670
Corsair TX-750W
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 8:27am

BSW727   Offline
Colonel
Please upload all images
to SimV.
Inside a Boeing 727

Gender: male
Posts: 202
*****
 
When you get to altitude, 3,000 MSL or higher, start twisting out the mixture until the RPM's start to fall off and push it back in until it stablizes.

Alternatively, you can use the CHT guage, but I've never had one in any airplane I've flown except the Mooney. I'd still rather do it with the RMP and my ear.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 8:34am

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
Mazza wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 4:02am:
Okay I have always had 'auto-mixture' on, but I would like to be cool and have it OFF, so I need to know when to apply different amounts of mixture (Lean, full, ect) So any advise would be great Smiley


For normally aspirated (Carburettor) Piston Engines the Mixture should be set Full Rich for take off, cruise, and landing.
(This also helps to cool the Cylinders).

For altitudes above 5,000 Feet ASL the Mixture can gradually be weakened to maintain the correct Petrol/Air mixture for to generate full power Power.
Slowly reduce the Mixture until the Engine starts to falter and run rough, then slightly increase until the Engine runs smooth again.
Observe the Engine RPM, and Suction Gauges...and note any change in airspeed.

Remember to apply Full Rich for landing...to keep the Cylinders cool to prevent engine overheating!

(A Weak Mixture generates heat!)

If taking off from an altitude higher than 5,000 Feet ASL remember to weaken the Mixture slightly for full power!

Paul...G-BPLF...FS 2004...and a packet of Dolly Mixture Sweets... Smiley...!
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 9:52am

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
MSFS has a unique bug, that actually helps in setting mixture.

In order for MSF to  "punish"  you for improper mixture, it takes power away.. which isn't altogether unrealistic.. it's just that they accomplish this by reducing fuel-flow. Their bizarre algorithm has fuel-flow tied directly to power, regardless altitude, and then reduces fuel-flow as you vary (one way or the other) from optimum mixture FOR a given altitude.

You can see this bug, if you takeoff with full rich.. leave it full rich and climb to something over 5000msl. Level off and then begin leaning. You'll see fuel-flow actually INCREASE at first.. then it will peak.. and then decrease again. That peak, is the optimum mixture setting for THAT altitude. It's kinda like a fuel-flow gauge is a very accurate and responsive EGT gauge..lol
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 10:33am

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
...and don't forget to pull the Mixture Knob to Full Weak to stop the Engine(s)....!

(This will empty the Carburettor Fuel Bowl to reduce the possibility of an accidental Ignition Start).

...THEN switch off the ignition!

NOT just switch off the Ignition to stop the Engine(s) (Grounding the Magnetos).

....and don't forget to apply Full Rich to Start the Engine(s).... Grin...!

Paul...G-BPLF...FS 2004...ate all the Dolly Mixtures... Cry...!

..its fun, (and educational!), playing with the Throttle, Mixture, and Carb Heater controls...and observing the Gauges and sound of the Engine(s) to the response... Smiley...!
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am

ShaneG   Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000
*****
 
Is there a method to the madness of finding the correct mixture setting for high elevation take offs?

ex: When taking off at La Paz, Bolivia, it's a hit and miss game trying to find the mixture/power optimization to get enough speed to take off.  I'm guessing that's why there is such a long runway there, and maybe my choice of aircraft isn't suited to those conditions.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:30am

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
ShaneG wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am:
Is there a method to the madness of finding the correct mixture setting for high elevation take offs?

ex: When taking off at La Paz, Bolivia, it's a hit and miss game trying to find the mixture/power optimization to get enough speed to take off.  I'm guessing that's why there is such a long runway there, and maybe my choice of aircraft isn't suited to those conditions.


Last year, I took a Warrior up into the mountains.. landed at Ingals field (KHSP). It was my first, high-density altitude takeoff in a 160hp airplane  Cheesy

All you do is push your runup to near full power and then lean for peak RPM. With a constant-speed prop, it's more an 'ear' thing.. but the theory is the same.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:42am

ShaneG   Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000
*****
 
So I was doing it correctly without even knowing I was.  Wink

Those kind of take offs make for an exciting challenge at times.  Cool
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Feb 2nd, 2010 at 7:36pm

flaminghotsauce   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 181
*****
 
ShaneG wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am:
Is there a method to the madness of finding the correct mixture setting for high elevation take offs?

ex: When taking off at La Paz, Bolivia, it's a hit and miss game trying to find the mixture/power optimization to get enough speed to take off.  I'm guessing that's why there is such a long runway there, and maybe my choice of aircraft isn't suited to those conditions.


THAT is quite the challenge. I attempted that with the 172. It takes a perfect mixture and a long runway for sure. I first threw in a notch of flaps, thinking in my flatland mind that it would help. It did not. More speed, less flaps, and I barely managed a takeoff. It is an excellent challenge to demonstrate mixture settings and high elevations.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Feb 3rd, 2010 at 2:05am

Mazza   Offline
Colonel
:D
Melbourne, Australia.

Gender: male
Posts: 3184
*****
 
Thanks for the advice guys  Wink
 

Sunset Chasing...RULES

...
AMD 9550 2.43 X4 - 2Gb RAM 800Mhz DDRII - Asus 4670
Corsair TX-750W
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Feb 3rd, 2010 at 6:57pm

aeroart   Offline
Colonel
Fly the good-old good
ones: Convairs, DC-6,
Connie
Michigan

Gender: male
Posts: 91
*****
 
With a fixed pitch prop, the answers about leaning the mixture at takeoff power until the rpm drops a bit, then enriching slightly to get the peak rpm, are right.

A constant-speed prop, however, will try to maintain the preset rpm. Lean until it starts sounding a bit rough, then enrich the mixture to smooth it.

References to altitude should really refer to "density altitude," not height above sea level. The aircraft's operating manual should have information about proper leaning.

I've flown from Tucson, Arizona and Edwards AFB in the Mojave Desert. At those 2,300' msl fields, the density altitude easily hit 6,000' on a hot August afternoon.

Art

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Feb 3rd, 2010 at 8:52pm

JoBee   Offline
Colonel
Better to give than receive.

Posts: 582
*****
 
flaminghotsauce wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 7:36pm:
ShaneG wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am:
...taking off at La Paz, Bolivia


I attempted that with the 172.

La Paz is over 13,000ft ASL, the C172 has a service ceiling of something like 14,000 ft. That's a recipe for disaster.

cheers,
Joe
 

Don't argue with idiots, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Feb 3rd, 2010 at 9:09pm

Brett_Henderson   Offline
Colonel
EVERY OUTER MARKER SHOULD
BE AN NDB

Gender: male
Posts: 3593
*****
 
aeroart wrote on Feb 3rd, 2010 at 6:57pm:
With a fixed pitch prop, the answers about leaning the mixture at takeoff power until the rpm drops a bit, then enriching slightly to get the peak rpm, are right.

A constant-speed prop, however, will try to maintain the preset rpm. Lean until it starts sounding a bit rough, then enrich the mixture to smooth it.

References to altitude should really refer to "density altitude," not height above sea level. The aircraft's operating manual should have information about proper leaning.

I've flown from Tucson, Arizona and Edwards AFB in the Mojave Desert. At those 2,300' msl fields, the density altitude easily hit 6,000' on a hot August afternoon.

Art




I'll quote myself from earlier in the thread  Smiley


Quote:
Last year, I took a Warrior up into the mountains.. landed at Ingals field (KHSP). It was my first, high-density altitude takeoff in a 160hp airplane 

All you do is push your runup to near full power and then lean for peak RPM. With a constant-speed prop, it's more an 'ear' thing.. but the theory is the same.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Feb 4th, 2010 at 6:59am

ShaneG   Offline
Colonel
I turned into a Martian!

Posts: 10000
*****
 
JoBee wrote on Feb 3rd, 2010 at 8:52pm:
flaminghotsauce wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 7:36pm:
ShaneG wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am:
...taking off at La Paz, Bolivia


I attempted that with the 172.

La Paz is over 13,000ft ASL, the C172 has a service ceiling of something like 14,000 ft. That's a recipe for disaster.

cheers,
Joe



It gets worse...

I did it in a C150 and real world weather.

http://205.252.250.26/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1262614320

NEVER did it get over 60kts IAS, and the rpm struggled the whole time... But... I did it. I guess this is where RTFM takes on a real urgency.  Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Feb 7th, 2010 at 2:45pm

flaminghotsauce   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 181
*****
 
ShaneG wrote on Feb 4th, 2010 at 6:59am:
JoBee wrote on Feb 3rd, 2010 at 8:52pm:
flaminghotsauce wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 7:36pm:
ShaneG wrote on Feb 2nd, 2010 at 11:09am:
...taking off at La Paz, Bolivia


I attempted that with the 172.

La Paz is over 13,000ft ASL, the C172 has a service ceiling of something like 14,000 ft. That's a recipe for disaster.

cheers,
Joe



It gets worse...

I did it in a C150 and real world weather.

http://205.252.250.26/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1262614320

NEVER did it get over 60kts IAS, and the rpm struggled the whole time... But... I did it. I guess this is where RTFM takes on a real urgency.  Wink

That's what makes it such a challenge, or course! How do those little planes get there anyway? Up the hill in a truck no doubt. Cheesy
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Feb 7th, 2010 at 3:46pm

JoBee   Offline
Colonel
Better to give than receive.

Posts: 582
*****
 
flaminghotsauce wrote on Feb 7th, 2010 at 2:45pm:
How do those little planes get there anyway? Up the hill in a truck no doubt. Cheesy

Interesting question.

I turned to Google Earth for an answer.

First thing I noticed, what's wrong with this pic?
...

Second thing I noticed was a complete lack of single engine planes, hehe. Granted this is a small snapshot in time. There are 2 planes there that might be single engine, hard to tell.

I guess a truck would be the correct answer.

cheers,
Joe
 

Don't argue with idiots, they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Feb 7th, 2010 at 11:55pm

C170b   Offline
Colonel
Aviation all the way!
KLMO

Posts: 233
*****
 
Here are the three ways I have learned to lean a engine:

1. On run up, lean it back until the RPMs peak. (They will go up and as they fall off, stop.) Then push the mixture control back in to the peak. This is the method that we use at high altitude.

2. This one takes a little time. Fly at full rich, and slowly pull the mixture control out until you get the highest EGTs. This is your peak EGT. Continue to lean it out until you are 100 degrees below the peak EGT. This is very close, (but not exactly) maximum power. It will keep your engine cool without throwing unburned fuel out of the engine.

3. This is one to do only alone or with your copilot only. It may scare your passengers a bit! Cheesy Start with a full rich mixture, and lean it out until the engine starts to run a tad rough, then push it in until you get a smooth running engine.

I hope this helps,
C170B   
 

Dell XPS 720: Liquid Cooled Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.40Ghz 8MB Cache, 2GB DDR3 SDRAM at 800MHZ, Seagate Barracuda HDD 250GB (7200RPM w/DataBurst), Seagate 300GB HDD, Seagate Grizzly HDD 500GB, Dell H750P-00 Power Supply (100-240v), Dual 16X DVD/CD +/-RW ROMS, NVIDIA/GALAXY Geforce GTS 250 (1GB, 256bit, DDR3), Windows XP Media Center, Dell E207FP Monitor (20in), Dell A525 30 Watt 2.1 Speakers w/ Subwoofer
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print