Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
RAM overclock... (Read 1098 times)
Sep 15th, 2009 at 10:37am

laurits   Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!

Posts: 38
*****
 
Hi. I've managed to push my Q6600 to nearly 3.7 Ghz and my  4x1 Gb Crucial Ballistics DDR2 Ram PC 6400 800 Mhz,  to 1105 Mhz with 5-5-5-15 settings.

Still the Sim is not performing well IMO -  with sliders at 3/4 approx.

Does anybody know if this RAM performs better at a lower speed, say 960 Mhz, and then be able to have the timing set to 4-4-4-12 instead..?

I can't really see any difference myself, but if anybody here are familiar with this combo, I would like an opinion.

Thanks for any help on this...

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Sep 17th, 2009 at 12:27pm

volunteer   Offline
Colonel
FSX flying is cool
Cessna 172 over Walmarts

Posts: 119
*****
 
I know that pushing the memory does not improve performance very much.

Every computer has a 'sweet' spot - where the overclock goes really well and is very stable : beyond that - and it crashes and performance does not increase further and you get heating probs.
 

E6600 overclocked to 3400. Asus P5N E sli with 3GB memory, Vista and 7900GS vid card. new Pro Yoke and pedals
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Dec 26th, 2009 at 12:01pm

Speed of flight   Offline
Colonel
Chasing the elusive "faster
than yesterday" goal.

Gender: male
Posts: 150
*****
 
The "sweet spot" theory is true. After a certain point, it isn't reliable anymore. If you adjust the latencies a little higher to get more speed, it really defeats the pourpose. It runs at 1000+ MHz, true, but if it waits 5 clock cycles rather than 4 to charge and strobe, the MHz seems to not matter anymore. With RAM, I use the lowest latencies possible, then try to push the MHz a little. I'm no tech MASTER, but I have noticed this to be true. Once you're at 4-4-4-12, that's about as rapid as ddr2 can strobe, charge, whatever. There is an inverse correlation to latency and speed. That's all I know about it. If you can get a higher score on a benchmarking tool, ok, but what we really want is for it to run programs and games faster. 4-4-4-12 is as tight as it gets.
Keep pushin! Hope this helps... Cool
 

Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z
AMD 8350 @4.65 GHz on H100i (226.8 x 20.5)
8 GB DDR3 1814 MHz CL8
ATI 6870 HD Radeon 1 GB
Antec 850 W PSU
Cooler Master HAF 932
500 GB and 200 GB HDDs
Windows 7x64
VRS F/A-18E Superbug, PMDG 747-400 & -8 and MD-11, Captainsim 777, Iris F-14A&B and A-10, Area 51 C-5M Super Galaxy and C-17, loads of others.
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Dec 26th, 2009 at 12:48pm
NNNG   Ex Member

 
4-4-4-12 @ 960mhz would likely be faster. Test it with sisoft sandra, or something, also.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print